余談。 .fmってミクロネシアなのね。知らんかった。絶対この人はミクロネシア人じゃないと思うけど。

From: "Robert Mueller" <>
Subject: Default zone_reclaim_mode = 1 on NUMA kernel is bad for file/email/web servers
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:39:12 +1000

So over the last couple of weeks, I've noticed that our shiny new IMAP
servers (Dual Xeon E5520 + Intel S5520UR MB) with 48G of RAM haven't
been performing as well as expected, and there were some big oddities.
Namely two things stuck out:

1. There was free memory. There's 20T of data on these machines. The
kernel should have used lots of memory for caching, but for some
reason, it wasn't. cache ~ 2G, buffers ~ 25G, unused ~ 5G
2. The machine has an SSD for very hot data. In total, there's about 16G
of data on the SSD. Almost all of that 16G of data should end up
being cached, so there should be little reading from the SSDs at all.
Instead we saw at peak times 2k+ blocks read/s from the SSDs. Again a
sign that caching wasn't working.

After a bunch of googling, I found this thread.

It appears that patch never went anywhere, and zone_reclaim_mode is
still defaulting to 1 on our pretty standard file/email/web server type
machine with a NUMA kernel.

By changing it to 0, we saw an immediate massive change in caching
behaviour. Now cache ~ 27G, buffers ~ 7G and unused ~ 0.2G, and IO reads
from the SSD dropped to 100/s instead of 2000/s.

Having very little knowledge of what this actually does, I'd just
like to point out that from a users point of view, it's really
annoying for your machine to be crippled by a default kernel setting
that's pretty obscure.

I don't think our usage scenario of serving lots of files is that
uncommon, every file server/email server/web server will be doing pretty
much that and expecting a large part of their memory to be used as a
cache, which clearly isn't what actually happens.

Rob Mueller