こんどはカーネルコンパイル速度を比較したけど、やっぱりext3のほうが速かったよ。というお話。


From: Jan Blunck
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kernel build time

After Andreas talk yesterday I did some tests on my T61. This is not really a
perfect benchmark setup but Andreas said I should send the data anyway.

make clean (ext3)
real 0m3.073s
user 0m1.324s
sys 0m1.444s

make -j 4 (ext3)
real 6m37.377s
user 10m58.081s
sys 1m38.890s

make clean (ext4)
real 0m6.443s
user 0m1.712s
sys 0m1.824s

make -j 4 (ext4)
real 6m42.694s
user 10m59.593s
sys 1m36.994s

Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype
needs_recovery extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg
dir_nlink extra_isize
Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash test_filesystem

That is with the patch queue from
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/2.6.26-ext4-1
on top of 2.6.26. Both ext3 and ext4dev are running on logical volumes (no
barrier support). I used the latest e2fsprogs available.

HTH,
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html